A fugitive people within a nation is tyranny.

Posts tagged ‘conduct’

Obama: Church Shouldn’t Focus on Protecting the Unborn & Marriage

by Barry Silver

666 the prezA couple of weeks ago President Obama took part in a panel discussion on poverty at Georgetown University where he launched into an attack on the focus of the Christian church in America. I’m not certain what makes him an expert exactly. I know he claims to be a constitutional law attorney. Funny though, the prez and the first lady were both attorneys, disbarred by the State of Illinois. Why is an attorney disbarred? An attorney is disbarred because of conduct unbecoming. It’s like being a soldier and being dishonorably discharged.

obsequious moderatorThe prez said that his comments were based on his “own Christian faith.” The panel was moderated by a famous Washington liberal, so the panel gravitated to praising the left while attacking the right when it comes to poverty. No discussion was made about the disparity in charitable giving between red and blue states, but simply to the fact that conservatives didn’t believe the government should be used for charity, while the left believes the government should be the main source of charity. Obama criticized churches for how they engage politically, focusing on “divisive issues” such as protecting life and preserving marriage.

“The president argued last week that churches would gain more followers if they embraced the “powerful” idea of helping those in poverty. “I think it would be powerful for our faith-based organizations to speak out on [poverty] in a more forceful fashion,” he said.

The president also said that advocating the redistribution of wealth is “vital to following what Jesus Christ, our Savior, talked about.”

More often, he engaged in double-speak like this:

“When it comes to what are you really going to the mat for, what’s the defining issue, when you’re talking in your congregations, what’s the thing that is really going to capture the essence of who we are as Christians, or as Catholics, or what have you, [poverty] is oftentimes viewed as a nice to have, relative to an issue like abortion.”

homelessThe ignorance of the president knows few bounds. To imply that ending poverty should be of greater concern to Christians than ending the holocaust of innocent lives through the eugenics of abortion is repulsive. All you hear liberals talk about is human rights until it comes down to actually considering what those rights are. Essentially, the unborn have no rights because they don’t have the capacity to vote.

burningrightsinternetMen don’t have rights either. They can vote, but they’ve been emasculated unless they want to tow the Washington line. The state can rob and plunder anyway it pleases. It sees itself as Robin Hood, especially as the champion of the children that it wants to own. It does this fully through single mothers. It champions the Bradley Amendment. It robs from parents and tolerates the church – for now. Government wants your faith. The church is simply poor competition. By deduction, Christians are pains in the arses to compete with the state in any way. Prez knows best.

dad-slaveryAs far as same-sex marriage goes, homosexuality is just another sin, conveniently listed among those sins, of which Yahweh says that no man or woman will enter His Kingdom. Many churches are already on a wide road to destruction according to scripture, but that’s another topic beyond the stupidity and corruptibility of American leaders and obsequious stone-headed church leaders. What a real Christian would best do isn’t covered much in public.

Violating Your Rights: It's in the Paperwork!

by E.J. Manning and Samuel Gaddie

As many of you caught up in the U.S. Child Support System know, due process and a just hearing are not really in the cards if the government has its way. The same applies in other nations as well. What is worse is that it feels awful to be exploited even if you aren’t quite sure how this works. Wonder no more. You are being exploited through the misconduct of law. For example, according the Attorney General of Kentucky,

“[Judges go] by the court order, not the work sheet. When I recommend an obligation amount to the court I submit a work sheet and the court then writes an order. It is the amount in the order that get’s put in… [the child support system], not the worksheet. I have a case now where the Judge did not go by the worksheet because of extraordinary circumstances. So the amount in the worksheet and the amount in the order are not always the same. The order has the force and effect of law. The worksheet shows the result of calculations based on the guidelines and income information of the parties. The work sheet provides guidance to the court, but standing alone is not binding or enforceable.”

kangaroo courtWhat the Attorney General fails to reveal or realize is that the child support work sheet of every case is RELEVANT and therefore covered under the full force of Federal Law including HIPAA privacy laws. HIPAA is relevant because the private health information of the child and parent is usually involved, since health care is typically a part support. This is especially important. Why? The States are not walking the fine line of the law. They are candidly violating the very laws just written… to facilitate oppressing you or to gain advantage over you. That is exploitation whether they consider it legal or not. The truth is, as we have briefly spoken, the execution behind the scenes is often illegal based even on judicial precedence, the current basis of the American legal system.

However, it is up to you to speak up about it, to file a complaint and to begin to earn a little respect instead of residing firmly under the thumb of the State, as well as the Feds that aren’t really looking at the letter of the law.

Naturally, “the system” will object. “There would be no reason for the court to transmit the worksheet to the Cabinet. The Cabinet is required to charge accounts based on orders. It cannot charge based on a worksheet.” Yet the worksheet is vital to developing a history and in evidence for any judicial decision. The system can’t have it both ways, even if they think they can. Within the system, this worksheet becomes a valuable electronic tool that contains your personal information, so you can argue that your worksheet is RELEVANT and is fully covered under the law.

The bottom line is this: The truth is that prima facie (“first sight”) fraud can be argued without your obligation worksheet being fully complete. Why? The information entered into the state child support system is inaccurate and incomplete, even voided because of this lack of completeness. This is misconduct within the system, especially since the judge uses this data to decide your case. Because this violates Federal HIPAA law because the health care of a child is involved, this makes matters worse.

It all comes down to this legal fact. The modification of support obligations is calculated based on guidelines.  The guidelines shall serve as a rebuttable presumption for the establishment or modification of the amount of child support.  Courts may deviate from the guidelines if the obligation amount is unjust or inappropriate.  Any deviation shall be accompanied by a written or specific finding on the record specifying the reason for the deviation by the court.

State and Federal law defines how a support obligation is calculated and its relation to the Child Support Guidelines table.  The guidelines table is used along with the Worksheet for Monthly Child Support Obligation to calculate a support obligation. This done electronically through the Obligation Calculations function using data from the obligation worksheet on the electronic input screen. The legal evidence indicates that all documents created by the court must be fully complete and accurate under the law.

The kicker is that the Worksheet for Monthly Child Support Obligation Exception is used only when a parent has 100% of the monthly adjusted parental gross income in many states. (This form also provides a reduction in gross income for the entire amount of health insurance premiums incurred and paid for any child.) The reasoning and documentation of the court and the system does not consider the reality of the non-custodial parent, or even his or her current income, but what it was. Per the Bradley Amendment for Social Security Administration, the court mistakenly assumes that this support will always be the same regardless of the circumstances of the “payor” or non-custodial parent. It does not technically allow for retroactive modification, yet the court often changes child support amounts due when the custodial parent relocates to another state, yet another example of the system failing to follow its own laws.

A modification is difficult, time-consuming and expensive. When you read the fine print, an attorney is required. We aren’t talking about frivolous matters here. We are talking about life: the blood, sweat and tears of American citizens that are held to have certain civil rights. The system is taking them away. Even attorneys are playing into the system. It is up to you to stand up for your rights since nobody else is doing so. The judge is king. Whatever he or she says in an order goes. Since this is clearly the case in U.S. law, the documents that back up must be complete and accurate, and in compliance with ALL Federal Law, including HIPAA. The details matter, but you must look into them. Whether you will continue to be exploited is up to you.

Get a copy of your state Child Support Handbook and get to know it. When you receive communication, be certain that you have timely notification and time for appeal as required by law. You have to be brighter than the data entry specialist sitting at the state child support terminal. Don’t let “the system” get away with ruining your life without having to work hard to do it.

Creative Commons License
Violating Your Rights: It’s in the Paperwork! by E.J. Manning & Samuel Gaddy is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://bradleyamendment.wordpress.com.

Tag Cloud